Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Christopher Heyman vs Corrado Summaria Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Heyman vs Summaria analysis and find out who is favored!
Christopher Heyman vs Corrado Summaria Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Heyman 1 - 0 Summaria
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Heyman has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Summaria has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Heyman, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Summaria has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Heyman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Summaria has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Heyman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Summaria winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Heyman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 113/ 58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 42/ 31). Summaria has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 8/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Heyman winning 1 times and Summaria being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Heyman winning 2 and Summaria winning 0. The last match between Heyman and Summaria was at the Italy F32 (Santa Margherita Di Pula), 04-10-2017, Second, Clay with Christopher Heyman getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:36:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Heyman and Summaria have played a deciding set 0 times, with Heyman winning 0 times and Summaria 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Heyman winning 0, and Summaria 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Heyman has played against opponents with an average rank of while Summaria has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Heyman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Summaria has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Heyman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Summaria has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
812
Rank
258
High
30
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
899
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
64% (352-201)
Career Total W/L
47% (67-76)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Christopher Heyman vs Corrado Summaria For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Heyman VS Summaria
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Christopher Heyman | Corrado Summaria |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:0 | 1:36:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (38/58) | 64% (36/56) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (27/38) | 61% (22/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (11/20) | 40% (8/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 29% (2/7) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (26/56) | 34% (20/58) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Christopher Heyman
Player
Corrado Summaria
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Christopher Heyman | Corrado Summaria |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Christopher Heyman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Christopher Heyman
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
11
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
77%
(
23 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
13 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Christopher Heyman
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Adrien Gobat
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sidane Pontjodikromo
Player
Christopher Heyman
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
59 of
77)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Philip Sekulic
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve %
69%
(
9 of
13)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
18
Total Points Won
13
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Christopher Heyman
74%
(
84 of
114)
1st Serve %
70%
(
77 of
110)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
46%
(
52 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
110)
115
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Olivier Rojas
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Jip Van Assendelft
82%
(
70 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
23 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(6) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Christopher Heyman
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Christopher Heyman
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Corrado Summaria Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Sarkissian
Player
Corrado Summaria
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ronald Slobodchikov
Player
Corrado Summaria
59%
(
63 of
107)
1st Serve %
71%
(
92 of
129)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
49 of
92)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
47%
(
9 of
19)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
43%
(
46 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
61 of
129)
122
Total Points Won
114
|
7-5 6-7(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gibril Diarra
Player
Corrado Summaria
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
76%
(
31 of
41)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Corrado Summaria
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
68%
(
53 of
78)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Corrado Summaria
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Corrado Summaria
Player
Daniil Zarichanskyy
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
54)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
19 of
23)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corrado Summaria
Player
Ludovico Cestarollo
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
66%
(
74 of
112)
7
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
4
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
57 of
74)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
27 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
37 of
112)
105
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(3) 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pietro Rondoni
Player
Corrado Summaria
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Corrado Summaria
Player
Horst Rieder
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Heyman Vs Summaria Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Heyman are available here and Summaria photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
